Legal Opinion

Meier v. Edsall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1943No. 30875PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Imogene Edsall, a minor, by Reno Edsall, her next friend and father, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against the defendant, Charles Meier, to recover damages for a personal injury resulting from an automobile collision on State Highway No. 8 on June 19, 1940. The cause was tried to a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff for $500, and judgment was entered thereon. Defendant appeals and in nine assignments of error presents four general propositions which, after a statement of facts, will be discussed in their order.

The facts are, substantially, that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McIntire v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Rice v. EmersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Sinclair Texas Pipe Line Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Fixico v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Henshaw v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Keck v. BrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Lee v. SwydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. LorinceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Burke v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API