Legal Opinion
Soto v. Sacco
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 19, 2016No. 1 CA-CV 15-0092PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge:
¶ 1 Michael Soto and Julie Kunstler Soto appeal from an order granting a new trial that became effective after Michael rejected a remittitur of damages awarded by a jury. 1 We hold that the Sotos’ appeal is timely and affirm the new trial order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 The Sotos were passengers in a cab driven by Anthony Sacco when it collided with another vehicle. The Sotos sued Sacco, Discount Enterprises Inc., and Total Transit, Inc. d/b/a Discount Cab (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants admitted Sacco’s negligence and respondeat superior liability. A jury…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Creamer v. TroianoArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Spur Feeding Company v. FernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Estate of Hanscome v. Evergreen at Foothills, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Santee v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael Soto v. Anthony M SaccoArizona Supreme Court · 2017