Legal Opinion

Michael Soto v. Anthony M Sacco

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2017No. CV-16-0136-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE LOPEZ,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 This case concerns the standards a trial court applies in granting a new trial or ordering remittitur or additur under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 59. Although a trial court should be circumspect when modifying a jury verdict, it nonetheless may do so if it states the Rule 69(a) or (i) grounds for the order and explains its ruling with sufficient particularity to avoid speculation as to its basis.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 This case arises from a motor vehicle accident, the salient facts of which are not in dispute. Michael Soto and his wife Julie (the “Sotos”)…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pope v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ahmad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  2. Connell v. Connell, IIICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  3. Cross v. Empressive Candles LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  4. Nolan v. HsbCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  5. Pino-Alvarez v. ErlichmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API