Legal Opinion
Griffioen v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 7, 2015No. 13-3170PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Mark Griffioen, Joyce and Mike Ludvicek, Sandra Skelton, and Brian Vanous (collectively, the Griffioen Group) filed an action seeking recovery for property damage that occurred during the June 2008 flooding of the Cedar River. They now appeal from the district court’s order and judgment denying their motion to remand the action to state court, granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Union Pacific Railway Company and Union Pacific Corporation (collectively, Union Pacific), and dismissing the claims against all defendant-appellees (collectively, the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jon Couzens, Jr. v. William DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Scott T. Richardson v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Christensen v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Padilla v. Am. Modern Home Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.