Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Am. Modern Home Ins. Co.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided September 30, 2017No. CIV 16–0559 JB/KBMPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1247Padilla then took advantage of his opportunity to reply to further address his breach-of-contract claim against Brown Insurance and Brown. See Tr. at 56:18-23 (Court, Romero). Padilla asserted that there are "lots of different claims related to failing to procure coverage," including breach of contract. Tr. at 57:4-18 (Romero, Court). Padilla contended that Brown Insurance and Brown failed to obtain the unlimited UM coverage that Padilla requested, and that New Mexico requires under the Mandatory Financial Responsibility Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 66-5-201 to -239. See Tr. at 57:25-58:9 (Romero).
2Cases cited70 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- American Family Insurance Company, SI v. Orgill Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Antwain Williams v. CertainTeed LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Bellecourt v. Constitution State Service, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Clayte High v. Kimiko Lewis, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Escano v. Concord Auto Protect, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.