Legal Opinion

Suntrust Securities, Inc. v. Marable

Charlottesville County Circuit Court

Decided March 31, 2004No. Case No. Ch. 03-194PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Edward L. Hogshire

Petitioner, Suntrust Securities, Inc., has filed an Application and Motion to Stay Arbitration Proceedings initiated against it by Martha M. Marable, Respondent. The Court, having reviewed the briefs and applicable authorities and having heard oral argument, for the reasons set forth in detail below, has determined that the Motion to Stay Arbitration Proceedings should be denied.

Summary of Facts

The pertinent facts, as set forth in the pleadings and memoranda, are not in dispute. Respondent was formerly employed by Petitioner as an investment consultant. Respondent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. American Recovery Corp. v. Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. v. North End 49ers Sandbridge Bulkhead Groups A, B and CSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martino v. Banc of America Services, Inc.Charlottesville County Circuit Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API