Legal Opinion
JVW Enterprises, Inc. v. Interact Accessories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 3, 2005No. 2004-1410PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
JVW Enterprises, Inc. (“JVW”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. After a bench trial, the district court determined that certain products distributed by Interact Accessories, Inc. (“Interact”) do not infringe any claim of United States Patent No. 4,494,754 (“the ’754 patent”). See JVW Enters., Inc. v. Interact Accessories, Inc., No. 00-CV-1867 (D.Md. Mar. 31, 2003) (“Bench, Trial Decision ”); JVW Enters., Inc. v. Interact Accessories, Inc., No. 00-CV-1867 (D.Md. Mar. 31, 2003) (“Judgment ”); JVW Enters., Inc. v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Celsis in Vitro, Inc. v. CellzDirect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. International Securities Exchange, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.