Legal Opinion
Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 4, 2010No. 2008-1334, 2008-1353PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
This case features computer graphics systems such as the type used to animate the Pixar Animation Studios (“Pixar”) movies Toy Story and Wall-E. The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of defendants ATI Technologies, Inc. (“ATI Inc.”), ATI Technologies ULC (“ATI ULC”), and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) (collectively “ATI”) on a number of claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,650,327 (the “'327 patent”). Silicon Graphics, Inc. v. ATI Techs., Inc., No. 06-611, 2008 WL 4200359 (Jan. 30, 2008)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- In Re NTP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- K-Tec, Inc. v. Vita-Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Cadence Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Exela Pharma Sciences LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Krippelz v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Flo Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. Patent and Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.