Legal Opinion

Levine v. New York Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.

This action is brought to recover the face amount of a life insurance policy by the widow of the insured, the beneficiary named in the policy. The policy contains the provision that “ due proof of death ” is required as a prerequisite to payment. At the trial the death of the insured was not disputed, and no rdflim that the policy was not in force at the time of death was asserted.

*807The answer contains three separate defenses: first, that the insured, his beneficiary, who is his widow and the plaintiff in this action, and his son, who was a hospital interne at the time the application for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. O'Reilly v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. McClelland v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Glazer v. . Home Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Binder v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. Hardebeck, Etc. v. City of AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Lampert v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  4. Haynes v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API