Legal Opinion

Lampert v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 3, 1939No. 183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This action is brought by the wife of the decedent, beneficiary under a policy of life insurance to which there was attached a supplementary contract known as “Accidental Death Benefit Provision.” The insurance company has already paid the plaintiff under the ordinary death benefit provisions of the policy, but has refused payment of the “double indemnity” on the ground that plaintiff has failed to comply with its contractual obligation to give “due proof” of death solely by accidental means. The policy provided: “Upon receipt of due proof of the death of the Insured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallory v. . the Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. O'Reilly v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Levine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Novice v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953
  3. Wharton v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API