Legal Opinion
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. King
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 22, 1912No. 19,202PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Action by the Barber Asphalt Paving Company against William T. King and another. A judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed “by the Court of Appeal, and Francis W. 'Crosby and others apply for a writ of certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the CourtPro Vo Sty, J.
The judgment of the ■'Court of Appeal in this ease reads as follows:
“This is a suit upon a street paving certificate issued against the property for paving, under the provisions of Act No. 73, of 1876, as .amended by Acts No. 119 of 1886 and No. 142 .of 1894. There having elapsed more than 10 .years since the certificate of completion had been recorded in the mortgage office, the following defenses are urged and will be considered seriatim:
[1] “I. It is claimed that plaintiff’s rights .have prescribed by the lapse of 10 years, under •the provision of R. C. C. art. 3544.
“Section 3 of the Act…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S. D. Moody & Co. v. Sewerage & Water BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Davidson v. LindopSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Gulf States Land Co. v. ParkerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1894
- Ayers Asphalt Paving Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Clark v. City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Kearns v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Standard Homestead Ass'n v. HorvathSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- State ex rel. Meriwether v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.