Legal Opinion
Painesville Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of Painesville
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 2010No. 2009-1616PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals granting the motion of appellee, city of Painesville, for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing the petition of appellant, Painesville Mini Storage, Inc., for a writ of mandamus to compel the city to commence an appropriation proceeding for its alleged taking of appellant’s property.
{¶ 2} Regardless of whether the R.C. 2305.07 six-year statute of limitations or the R.C. 2305.09(E) four-year statute of limitations applies to appellant’s takings claim, the claim is barred. See State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParks, 124 Ohio St.3d 449,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParksOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Tenenbaum v. CalderaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Ohio Midland, Inc. v. Ohio Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Bauer v. BrunswickOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bd. of Educ. of the Loveland City Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Trs. of Symmes Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Cooper v. City of West Carrollton, OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State ex rel. GreenAcres v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.