Legal Opinion
Ohio Midland, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2008No. 07-3575UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, the plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for leave to amend their complaint and appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Norfolk Southern Railway on its counterclaim for breach of contract. Plaintiffs are the owners of a bridge spanning the Ohio River, and have sought to compel the Ohio Department of Transportation either to rebuild the bridge ramp it demolished in 1991 or to pay the plaintiffs damages resulting from lack of the ramp, including the bridge’s long-term non-use and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Daniel Browning, D/B/A Daniel Browning Excavating Co. Linda Browning v. Craig R. PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Lrl Properties v. Portage Metro Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Regis Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- State ex rel. Nickoli v. Erie MetroParksOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Painesville Mini Storage, Inc. v. City of PainesvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Commerce Benefits Group, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.