Lincoln v. Felt
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Otis Lincoln presented for probate an instrument, in form a deed, as the last will and testament of Laura L. Felt, deceased. The instrument was disallowed in the probate court on a contest by Noah Felt, and others, the husband and heirs at law of deceased, and proponent appealed to the circuit. From a judgment for proponent, contestants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This controversy relates to the probate of an instrument, in form a deed, as the last will- and testament of Mrs. Laura L. Felt. Mrs. Felt was proponent’s mother. The contestants are the three children of Mrs. Felt by her second marriage. It appeared that she was the owner of a 29-acre piece of land, — that in controversy in this case, — and that her husband was the owner of a 50-acre piece. In these circumstances Mrs. Felt sought to make some provision for proponent, who would not'inherit from her second husband. The testimony adduced on the part of proponent tended to show that she executed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lautenshlager v. LautenshlagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Eastman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Ferris v. NevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Bigley v. SouveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Clay v. LaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- In re Broffee's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- In re Dowell's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Moody v. MacomberMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.