Legal Opinion
Cain v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 2004No. 25386PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.
Pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo 2000, the Director of Revenue (“Director”) revoked the driving privileges of Joel H. Cain based on his refusal to submit to a chemical test upon his arrest for driving while intoxicated.
Cain petitioned the Circuit Court of Hickory County for review. In his petition, Cain contended, in part, that: (1) he was not properly under arrest; (2) the arresting officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe Cain was driving while intoxicated; and (3) Cain did not refuse to submit to a chemical test at the request of the arresting officer.
After an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Rain v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hawkins v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Baptist v. LohmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Edmisten v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flaiz v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bruce v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sonia Kuessner v. Justin WootenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Findley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Stuart v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016