Stuart v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
James Stuart (“Stuart”) appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s (“the Director”) suspension of his driver’s license. Stuart was arrested at his home several hours after he was involved in a motor-vehicle accident. Stuart was found at his home in an obviously intoxicated condition. The sole issue on appeal is whether there existed probable cause to arrest Stuart for driving while intoxicated.- The record contains substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that a prudent, cautious, and trained police officer would have found…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Cox v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boggs v. Dir. of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Shanks v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Mannino v. Dir. of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018