Legal Opinion

Holdingford Milling Co. v. Hillman Farmers Co-Operative Creamery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1930No. 27,970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to recover for merchandise sold by the plaintiff to defendant at the agreed price of $1,036.50. The sale was admitted and payment alleged. The court found no payment had been made, and directed judgment for plaintiff for the agreed priqe with interest from November 30, 1927. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered.

The evidentiary facts are hardly in dispute. Goods of the agreed price stated were sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant between the 21st and the 30th of November, 1927. On December 5, 1927, defendant mailed its check to plaintiff for $1,036.50, drawn on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Jensen v. Laurel Meat Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hommerberg v. State Bank of SlaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Tobiason v. First State Bank of AshbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bohlig v. First National Bank in WadenaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Garland v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. County of Lincoln v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. McGoldrick Lumber Co. v. Farmers Lumber Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Osage National Bank v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API