Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934No. Docket No. 124, Calendar No. 37,565PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Defendant has appealed from an order modifying the original decree of divorce granted plaintiff and allowing her increased alimony. The original decree was entered on December 2, 1932, and allotted to plaintiff the snm of $10 per week for the support of one child until he should reach the age of 17 years. Nothing was provided for the support of three older children, including an 18-year old son who is living with plaintiff at the present time. Defendant was also ordered to pay plaintiff, as permanent alimony for her own support and maintenance, the further sum of $75 per month until the first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Perkins v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Sherman v. KentMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Gould v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Aldrich v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Binkow v. BinkowMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Battisti v. BattistiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API