Melamed v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
—Dr. Hooman Melamed (Plaintiff), a physician at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, operated on a 12-year-old patient, causing complications requiring corrective surgery. The hospital suspended Plaintiff, who requested a peer review hearing challenging the suspension. Every level of administrative review upheld the suspension. Plaintiff did not seek mandamus review of these decisions. Plaintiff then filed suit against Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Cedars), its medical staff, and the specific doctors involved in the summary suspension decision. The hospital filed an anti-SLAPP…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Behazin v. Dignity Health CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Datomi v. Huntington Memorial Hospital CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- De Picciotto v. Seneca Healthcare DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021