Legal Opinion

Hart v. O'Rourke

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1898No. 18,369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

On March 30, 1897, appellee O’Rourke commenced an action against appellant before a justice of the peace of Tippecanoe county to recover for merchandise sold and delivered to appellant by said appellee, and also filed an affidavit and undertaking for a writ of garnishment against the receiver of the Monon Railway Company. The affidavit and undertaking were filed under the provisions of the act of 1897 (Acts 1897, p. 233). No affidavit showing any grounds of attachment, as required by section 925, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (913, Horner’s R. S. 1897), was filed. A summons was served on appellant, and a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pomeroy v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hume v. ConduittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Brown v. GobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Ex parte McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Davis v. ClementsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Livingston v. LivingstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Burton v. GelbIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hoffman v. RomackIndiana Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API