Legal Opinion

Bonnett v. State ex rel. Division of State Lands

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 1997No. 16-95-02466; CA A93571PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiff is the owner of Government Lot 1, Section 9, Township 18 South, Range 12 West in Lane County (Lot 1). When it was originally surveyed in 1878, the western boundary of Lot 1 was partly on the northeast bank of the mouth of the Siuslaw River and partly on the Pacific Ocean. In this action, plaintiff seeks to quiet title to a large amount of land that has developed west of Lot 1 since the original survey (the new land). Plaintiff took defaults against all defendants except the state. The state asserts that the land in issue first arose on state-owned tidelands west of Lot 1. As a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Payless Drug Stores Northwest v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Land Board v. SAUSEOregon Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Denison v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Norby v. Estate of KuykendallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API