Legal Opinion

Sea River Properties, LLC v. Parks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2012No. 062011; A145896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment in which the trial court quieted title in favor of defendant Parks, based on adverse possession, to 40 acres of undeveloped land located in the coastal town of Nedonna Beach. The trial court’s decision was premised on the intermediate conclusion that plaintiff was the record owner of the property based on the doctrine of accretion. Defendant cross-assigns error to that conclusion. Because we agree with defendant that plaintiff failed to establish that it was the record owner of the disputed property, we affirm, albeit on different grounds.

Adverse possession and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. State Land Board v. SAUSEOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Allison v. ShepherdOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. K. R. C. v. Three Affiliated TribesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksOregon Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API