Legal Opinion

Caspari v. Bohlen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1994No. 92-1500PublishedCited by 667 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U. S. 430 (1981), we held that a defendant sentenced to life imprisonment following a trial-like capital sentencing proceeding is protected by the Double Jeopardy Clause against imposition of the death penalty if he obtains reversal of his conviction and is retried and reconvicted. In this case we are asked to decide whether the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits a State from twice subjecting a defendant to a noncapital sentence enhancement proceeding.

I

Respondent and others entered a jewelry store in St. Louis County, Missouri, on April 17, 1981. Holding store…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by667 opinions

  1. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

662 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API