Legal Opinion
People v. Gustafson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
At the Huntley hearing the arresting officer testified that on the day preceding the arrest he went to the pharmacy in response to a call that a man was there with a forged prescription. By the time he arrived at the pharmacy, the man had left; the pharmacist gave him a description, however. The next day he received a call that the man had returned to the pharmacy. When the officer arrived, the pharmacy clerk pointed defendant *1056out to him as the one with the forged prescription. Defendant was acting “furtive”. In the officer’s opinion, he matched the description the pharmacist had given him…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. MatosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HorsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. RowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. GroateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. BoyntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. CarverNew York Supreme Court · 2013