Legal Opinion
Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 4, 2004No. 88-1003; A118136PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB or the board) denying his request for conditional release. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. STATUTORY BACKGROUND
A brief review of the relevant statutes and rules will aid in understanding the facts and arguments in proper context. ORS 161.295 provides:
“(1) A person is guilty except for insanity if, as a result of mental disease or defect at the time of engaging in criminal conduct, the person lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of the conduct or to conform…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Owens v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rinne v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. MeiserOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. MeiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Rinne v. PSRBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- State v. MeiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.