Legal Opinion

Zimmer v. Clark

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1931No. Appeal 62PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kelle®, J.,

This action was brought to recover the damages sustained by a four year old child, and her parents, by her being knocked down and run over by defendant, while driving his automobile. From the judgment in the minor plaintiff’s favor this appeal is taken.

The case raised questions of fact which were submitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge to which no exceptions were taken, beyond the refusal to give binding instructions for the defendant.

Appellant contends that the incontrovertible physical facts adduced on the trial were such as to prevent a recovery by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hegarty v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Snyder v. Penn Liberty Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Scalet v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Pfeffer v. JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Winters v. York Motor Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Adams v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Clarke Et Ux. v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Hoff v. TavaniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API