Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Snell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 24, 1992, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant was initially discharged by the employer in 1986 and was subsequently rehired in June 1990 under a "last chance” agreement. The agreement required claimant to abstain from using drugs or alcohol and to submit to random urine and blood testing, and provided that positive test results *747would result in his discharge. According to the employer’s representative, claimant was rehired based on information pointing "to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the Claim of AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. In re the Claim of GrajalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of OpokaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re the Claim of MatyjczukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API