In re the Claim of Pluckhan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Mikoll, J. P.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 7, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a customer service agent for the employer, a commercial airline company. She was terminated September 27, 1994 after coming into work some two hours late. The reason articulated by the employer for her discharge was repeated tardiness and absenteeism. Her claim for unemployment insurance benefits was denied for misconduct.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of AnumahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Matter of McCarthy (Grunblatt Psychology & Counseling Offs., P.C.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017