Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Pluckhan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikoll, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 7, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a customer service agent for the employer, a commercial airline company. She was terminated September 27, 1994 after coming into work some two hours late. The reason articulated by the employer for her discharge was repeated tardiness and absenteeism. Her claim for unemployment insurance benefits was denied for misconduct.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Claim of MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re the Claim of SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AnumahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Matter of McCarthy (Grunblatt Psychology & Counseling Offs., P.C.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API