Legal Opinion
B.H. v. Johnson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 30, 1989No. 88 C 5599PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, Chief Judge.
This case comes before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss. We grant the motion in part.
FACTS
For purposes of this motion, we accept all well-pleaded facts as true and draw reasonable inferences in favor of plaintiffs. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Named plaintiffs, B.H., C.H., J.E., C.Z., E.G., O.G., S.G., C.G., P.G., and A.G., represent a class of “all persons who are or will be in the custody of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and who have been or will be placed somewhere other…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Suter v. Artist M.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Foster Children v. Jeb Bush, Kathleen Kearney, Chuck Bates, Robert Williams, Ester TibbsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- K.H. ex rel. Murphy v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.