Legal Opinion

United States v. Copeland

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 12, 1954No. Cr. 8923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Defendant, classified 1-0 by the Selective Service Board, was ordered to report for work of national importance under civilian direction in the employ of Goodwill Industries, Inc.

He refused to report, was indicted for violation of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 451 et seq., waived jury trial and was tried to the Court.

He moves for dismissal of the indictment on the ground that the Selective Service Regulations 1660.1 and 1660.20 as construed and applied by the order to perform civilian work in this case at the Goodwill Industries,-…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Robertson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Butler v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emil Yaich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. United States v. Armand Fred Hoepker, United States of America v. Walter Gail Thomas, United States of America v. Edward L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. Daniel Howard Johnson v. United States of America, John Franklin Taylor v. United States of America, Manuel Sanchez Gallegos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. SimpsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API