Legal Opinion
Union Carbide Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 12, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-208 MMSPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
On April 15, 1983, Union Carbide Corporation (“Carbide”) filed this action charging the Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) with infringement of U.S. Reissue Letters Patent No. Re. 28,715 and No. Re. 29,118, both relating to the production of elastic polyurethane products. In its amended answer and counterclaim, Dow has denied infringement of the patents and has challenged their validity on several grounds, including fraud and double patenting. (Defendant’s Amended Answer and Counterclaims, Docket Item (“Dkt.”) 34). Presently before the Court are two motions…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Fmc Corporation, Douglas E. Kliever and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Nidec Corp. v. Victor Co. of JapanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.