Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Rudy
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Delaware Circuit Court; Joseph G. Le.ffler, Judge. Action by the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company against Clayton IT. Rudy and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1394 Burns 1908, subd. 2, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
Appellee Clayton IT. Rudy, by special contract in writing, contracted with the Oregon Short Line Rail*184way for the transportation of a carload of horses from Lima, Montana, to Peoria, Illinois, and with the appellant, by a like contract, for the transportation of the same horses from Peoria, Illinois, to Yorktown, Indiana, and this action was brought by appellant against all of the appellees, on the contract made, to recover the freight charges. There was a general denial to the complaint by each of the defendants. Each also filed two paragraphs of what are denominated answer and counterclaim,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wenning v. TeepleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Rapp v. KesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Evans v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Murray v. FryIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Vandalia Coal Co. v. YemmIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Adkins v. City of Tell CityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Metz Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Red Men's Fraternal Accident Ass'n of America v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Oelbermann v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.