Legal Opinion

Oelbermann v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1925No. 4257PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The text-books are in accord in stating the rule that a condition in a contract of carriage requiring that notice of claim of damages be presented within a stated tixhe may be waived by the carrier, either expressly or by conduct inconsistent with an intention to rely upon it, and that where a claim is presented after the time so limited, and payment is refused for reasons not involving the promptness of the notice, but on entirely different grounds, there is a waiver. 1 Hutchinson on Carriers (3d Ed.) p. 473 ; 4 R. C. L. 799; 10 C. J. 342.

In the text last…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Hudson & Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Reynolds v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GraysonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Merchants & Miners' Transportation Co. v. EichbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. WR Grace & Co. v. Panama R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. The FerncliffDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  3. The NatalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Joshua Bohmker v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. C. I. T. Corp. v. CarlCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API