Murray v. Fry
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Sarah Mwrray, an infant, by her next friend', Bronson, sued Fry in assumpsit. The declaration sets out a special contract between Sarah and Fry, to the effect that she was to work in the family of Fry until she was eighteen years old, being about two years from March 1, *3721846; that Fry, on his part, agreed to furnish Sarah board, clothing, &c., and, at the end of the term, to furnish her a cow of the value of 12 dollars, a bed of the value of 20 dollars, and other household furniture of the value of 50 dollars, in consideration of her work and labor, &c. She then avers that she faithfully…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peyton v. BowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1823
3Cited by12 opinions
- De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Merrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Rapp v. KesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Palmer v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Smathers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.