Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanaway

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 24, 1961No. 15,427PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

Before a special court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to, and was found guilty of, a number of violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, partial forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for four months. On review before the board of review, it was contended that the plea of guilty to one of the offenses was improvident because the facts disclosed in defense counsel’s statement in mitigation showed that when the accused cashed a check which did not belong to him he did not intend to deprive the payee permanently…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CrusoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. EppersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. Dosal-MaldonadoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. BruceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. CaidUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. PattersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. VaughnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API