Spotswood v. Spotswood
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. Q. "White, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an action to quiet title. The complaint is in the usual form. The answer denies that plaintiff is the owner or in the possession of any part of the property in controversy, or has been for several years, and alleges that defendant is and has been since 1891 and 1892 the owner and in possession of the whole of said property, and avers that plaintiff claims some interest in the same which is without right, and asks for judgment quieting defendant’s title to said property. The findings follow the denials and averments of the answer. The judgment is the appropriate conclusion from the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olson v. CornwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. EmmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- McMorris v. PaganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Laist v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Mezerkor v. MezerkorOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.