Legal Opinion

Soriero v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1995No. 94-1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of plaintiff Frank J. Soriero (“plaintiff’) and defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant Soriero’s motion for summary judgment and will deny the FDIC’s motion for summary judgment. Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff and against the FDIC.

I. BACKGROUND

This ease involves a claim for supplemental pension benefits made by a former employee of a failed bank, against the FDIC, as receiver for the bank.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maureen A. Navarro v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Navarro, Maureen A. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API