Legal Opinion

In Re Shuford's Will

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was submitted upon facts agreed, upon three propositions:

1. Whether the widow was estopped to dissent from the will on 2 November, 1912, because she had qualified as executrix on 11 May, 1912. It is agreed as a fact that immediately prior to her qualification she advised with her son-in-law, who was an attorney at law, and was advised by him and also by her son, a reputable business man, that by arrangement among the devisees a further and more adequate provision would be made for her than that in the will, and that if it was not done she would have a period of six months in which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. . HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Neill v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Green v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Simonton v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Guyther v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. . HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. In Re Will of MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Joyce v. JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API