Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Joyce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeNNY, C.J.,

The defendants assign as error the .action of the court below -in signing judgment to the effect that the act of qualifying as executrix under the circumstances involved did not estop the plaintiff from subsequently dissenting from her husband’s will within six months after probate, and that she is entitled to take a share in the estate of her late husband in the same manner .and to. the same extent as -though he had died intestate.

Ordinarily, where a widow offers a will for probate ‘and qualifies as executrix thereunder, .and -enters upon the duties of her office, or knowingly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Will of MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. In Re Shuford's WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. In re Will of ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Richardson v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. BrigmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Hurdle v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API