Legal Opinion

Claim of Hiers v. John A. Hull & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, John A. Hull & Co., and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the New York office of said Commission on the 4th day of May, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, J.:

The occupation of the claimant was weighing hides on the piers in Brooklyn, which hides constituted cargoes or parts of cargoes unloaded from vessels. He was doing this work in the performance of the duties which as an employee he owed to his employer. The employment was, therefore, hazardous within the meaning of group 10 of section 2 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67; Laws of 1914, chap. 41).

Previous to February 10, 1916, while in the same work, wet salt from the hides had permeated his gloves and caused a swelling on the back of one of his hands and an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bacon v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Claim of Plass v. Central New England Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Buel v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. GloverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Claim of Richardson v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Chase v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API