Claim of Richardson v. Greenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Harry Greenberg, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of the clerk of said Commission on the 1st day of July, 1918, and also from the findings of said Commission entered in said clerk’s office on the 11th day of December, 1918. A question is certified by the State Industrial Commission to the Appellate Division, j
1Opinion of the Court
H. T. Kellogg, J.:
The State Industrial Commission has certified to this court the following question: “ Was the contraction of glanders, under the circumstances as found by the Commission, which resulted in the death of Elmer Richardson, an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law? ” The findings made by the Commission are substantially to this effect: That Elmer Richardson was employed as a stable man by Harry Greenberg; that while so employed he was required to lead a horse affected with glanders through the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bailey v. Interstate Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Bacon v. . U.S.M.A. Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Claim of Hernon v. HolahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Matter of Eldridge v. . Endicott, Johnson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Buchanan v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Brodin's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
- Svensson v. Securian Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.