Disciplinary Counsel v. Proctor
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Philip Lucas Proctor of Newark, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0041956, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1989.
{¶ 2} In a complaint filed on August 17, 2009, relator, disciplinary counsel, alleged that Proctor had violated multiple provisions of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct and the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar in Ohio by making allegations of impropriety against his opposing counsel and the trial judge either while knowing the allegations to be false or with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity.
{¶ 3} The parties submitted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ShimkoOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. MacalaOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Morton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.