Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Abston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1900PublishedCited by 32 opinions

.FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. E. H. Heiskell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is an action by complainants, claiming under a chattel mortgage executed and registered in Arkansas, to held the defendant liable for the proceeds of five bales of cotton upon which the mortgage rested, and which -were sold by the defendant, a commission merchant or cotton factor in Memphis.

The bill was demurred to on two .grounds — one that it is not alleged that the defendant still has the proceeds of the cotton in his hands, and has not in good faith paid them over to the person for whom he made the sale, and, second, that the mortgage is invalid because the property purported to be…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Davidson Benedict Co. v. SeversonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Tennessee Central Railroad v. VanhoyTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Middle Tennessee R. v. McMillanTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Graves v. Illinois Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API