Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad v. Van Houten
Indiana Supreme Court
From tbe Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion
On Petition eok a Rehearing.
Downey, J.
In disposing of a petition for a rehearing in this ■case, we depart from the usual practice by writing what we now have to say.
Counsel for appellee suppose that the case turned upon the point whether there were three or only two passenger cars in the train, and therefore have made an application for a certiorari, to bring up a correct copy of the complaint, alleging that by the original complaint it will appear that the allegation in the first paragraph was, that there were only two cars. Conceding the fact to be true, and we are satisfied that it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Fankboner v. FankbonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Warner v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Peery v. Greensburgh, Kingston, & Clarksburgh Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Speer v. SpeerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.