James v. Clackamas County
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.
This case concerns the scope of Clackamas County’s contractual obligation to provide health insurance benefits to command officer retirees of the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office. A contract between the county and command officers, including plaintiff, Neil James, required the county to use a particular fund to pay for a certain level of health insurance benefits to command officers after they retired. The contract added, however, that the obligation to pay benefits was “contingent upon the availability of sufficient funding in said fund to pay for the same.” After plaintiff retired, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Anderson v. Jensen Racing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- James v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Brownstone Homes Condominium Ass'n v. Brownstone Forest Heights, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Barnhart v. Fastax Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Department of Human Services v. A.B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Dept. of Human Services v. D. C. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.