Legal Opinion

Peacock Construction Co. v. Turner Concrete, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1967No. 43041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The first ruling enumerated as error is that the judge, over objection of Peacock, the sole defendant originally named in the suit, and New Amsterdam, allowed an amendment to the petition which: (1) joined New Amsterdam as a new party defendant; (2) added a new cause of action which was a suit on a surety bond executed by Peacock as principal and New Amsterdam as surety. The ruling was contrary to law. Code § 81-1303 (of force when the case was tried) provides: “No amendment adding a new and distinct cause of action or new and distinct parties shall be allowed unless expressly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tumlin v. Bass Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Johnson v. QuinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  3. Hancock v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. Blue v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Magid v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Peacock Construction Co. v. Turner Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API