Marin v. Hahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Mel Marin appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Marin’s request to proceed in forma pauperis because Marin failed to verify his poverty adequately. See United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (holding that motion made under 28 U.S.C.. § 1915 was properly denied where…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. First National Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
3Cited by180 opinions
- Albury III v. Strategic Staffing SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Angelica B. Wallace Bazile v. Department of Disability Services, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Anthony A. Adams v. Tesla General Insurance, Inc; et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Arroyo v. BihDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Arroyo v. BihDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.