Legal Opinion
Arroyo v. Bih
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 16, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01510Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Jeromy Arroyo, 2:24-cv-01510-GMN-MDC 4 Plaintiff(s), ORDER DENYING IFP APPLICATION 5 vs. 6 Peter Bih, et al., 7 Defendant(s). 8 Pending before the Court is pro se plaintiff Jeromy Arroy’s Motion/Application to Proceed In 9 Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 1) and Complaint (ECF No. 1-2). For the reasons stated below, the 10 Court DENIES the IFP application. The Court DEFERS addressing the Complaint at this time. 11 DISCUSSION 12 I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 A. Legal Standard 14 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.