Legal Opinion

Angelica B. Wallace Bazile v. Department of Disability Services, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 7, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01887Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Angelica B. Wallace Bazile, No.: 2:25-cv-01887-JAD-MDC 4 Plaintiff, 5 vs. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 6 PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 2) 7 Department of Disability Services, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 Pending before the Court is pro se plaintiff Angelica B. Wallace Bazile’s Application to Proceed 10 In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2). The Court DENIES the IFP application without prejudice. 11 Plaintiff must either file a new Long Form IFP application OR pay the full filing $405 fee by November 12 11, 2025. 13 DISCUSSION…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Kennedy v. HuibregtseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API