Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate Committee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1992No. C7-91-1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
FACTS
Russell Doty filed a complaint with the Minnesota Ethical Practices Board, alleging that Senator Sandy Pappas failed to comply with statutory filing and disclosure requirements and that she exceeded campaign spending limits. After an investigation, the board concluded that Pappas “unintentionally exceeded the applicable 1990 campaign expenditure limit” by $903.42. Then, the board negotiated a penalty with Pappas wherein the board accepted payment of a fine in the amount of $903.42 and dismissed the complaint.
Doty obtained a writ of certiorari to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re the Implementation of Utility Energy Conservation Improvement ProgramsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Minnesota State Ethical Practices Board v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Mankato Aglime & Rock Co. v. City of MankatoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate CommitteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992